Bookmark and Share Increase Text Size Decrease Text Size Print this page PDF this page E-mail this page
x
  |  
Published: February 01, 2013  |  Updated: February 01, 2013
What's So Scary About Smart Meters?
How to Effectively Overcome Consumer Fears
« Please login to recommend content
(0)

Sometimes I wonder: What makes many people so comfortable with using smartphones but so concerned with the health dangers and privacy details of smart meters? Rationally speaking, it seems to me that using a smartphone involves at least as much of a health and privacy risk as having a smart meter installed on the side of your house; the phone can track where you are, who you text, when you make a call, what websites you visit, and more—all while bombarding your head with powerful cellular radio waves. Yet many people who are willing to overlook these concerns with a phone become simultaneously obsessed with fears over smart meters.

I find this logical contradiction fascinating. Clearly, consumer fears about smart meters are not rational, which means that a response relying on facts to address these fears will almost certainly be ineffective. One great example of a logical response that appears unlikely to resolve these consumer fears is the recent 80-page Public Utility Commission of Texas report (PDF) on how “scientific research reveals no definite or proven biological effects from exposure to low-level RF [radio-frequency] signals.” Does anyone actually think that a consumer who calls utility customer support on his iPhone to complain about the health hazards of his new smart meter is going to read this entire report and subsequently realize the irrationality of his own behavior?

A recent article on Intelligent Utility describes the irrationality of consumer fears about smart grid. According to the article, the main reason that people are willing to overlook health and privacy concerns with smartphones is that these devices are primarily social tools, and humans highly value social interaction. Professor Larry D. Rosen explains, “From all of my research, we have seen that people are mostly using technology for communication and social interaction. Their phones are a major source of connection for them, and connection is a basic human need.”

The article explains that, according to Rosen, “the major difference in fear between smartphones and smart meters may be tied to our deepest subconscious; the phone is all about connecting. And, for that connection, that human contact, we’re willing to sacrifice privacy—something that may not be said for smart meters.”

Rosen said, “As a species, we are willing to give up quite a bit of ourselves and our privacy for a feeling of being connected.”

Short of offering a free smartphone with every new meter, how can utilities effectively respond to consumer concerns about smart meters? First, Rosen explained, “Fear can be overcome with gain.” That is, using smart meters to offer customers tangible rewards such as rebates, increased reliability, and greater control over energy use could help to convince many people that the benefits of smart meters clearly outweigh any potential risks.

In addition, Rosen advises utilities to “connect to the friendship network of the consumer’s choosing to make it more acceptable.” Far from simply trying to get customers to become fans of the company’s Facebook page, utilities should think of this strategy as leveraging the data from smart meters to make energy use a social experience in which customers can interact with their existing social connections. For example, social applications allowing customers to compare energy use to their peers and compete to win prizes could make viewing smart meter data a much more enjoyable experience. (Check out our recent blog post Fun and Games with Facebook! for more on this topic.)

Finally, remember that your customers aren’t deliberately raising concerns about smart meters to make your job more difficult. The Intelligent Utility article counsels, “Don’t take the fact that a consumer loves his more-intrusive cell phone and hates his less-intrusive smart meter personally. It’s not a choice; it’s a natural response from the very basic depths of the human psyche.” Rather than becoming frustrated over this irrational behavior and trying to win the argument with facts and logic, utilities can respond to customer concerns in a way that effectively overcomes their fears by transforming smart meter data into tangible benefits and a social experience.

How has your utility worked to effectively overcome consumer concerns surrounding smart meters?

« Please login to recommend content
(0)
Categories: Social media
Comments
Beth,

I am an engineer. I have used technology my entire adult life - cell phones, smart phones, wi-fi, laptops, you name it. I really enjoyed all of this and had no issues or fears related to technology.

Then, when a bank of smart meters were put next to our apartment, both my wife and I starting experiencing headaches, insomnia, heart palpitations and tinnitus. Within a couple weeks, I could no longer use a cell phone without the same symptoms. Within a month I could feel the microwave radiation from cell towers. I have had to completely change my life because of this.

This has happened to thousands of people once smart meters are installed on/near their home. People are not making this up. Most of the people I know who have experienced this are highly educated and loved using technology before becoming sensitized to microwave radiation. Now they are forced to leave their homes and neighborhoods because entire communities are polluted with pulsed microwave radiation and dirty electricity.

The premise of your post is simply false. Those of us who have been injured are not afraid of technology. Indeed, Smart Meters are a toxic technology. More and more people are realizing this every day. Frankly, anyone supporting this technology is on a sinking ship.

The idea of a smart grid may indeed be beneficial (I am also an environmentalist), but the way it is currently being implemented is a complete debacle.

If you think I am alone, here is just one of many webpages with hundreds of stories just like mine: http://emfsafetynetwork.org/?page_id=2292

Do you really think all these people would just make this up? Perhaps the assumption that pulsed microwave radiation is safe, is actually false...
Sorry to hear that you are not feeling well. The premise of this post is that in our modern society, there are many sources of microwave radiation (smart phones and meters being just two examples) but it appears that human psychology motivates some people to believe that meters can cause ill effects that they are less inclined to attribute to other factors in their environment. Both smart phones and meters have been extensively studied, as described for meters in the link above to the Texas PUC report, but the natural psychological response to smart meters can cause some people to reject the conclusions of this research.
Beth, I had read the Texas PUC report when it came out. The analogy of tobacco and asbestos is poignant here. For decades, government agencies and even doctors said these were fine for us. So, for government agencies to say some thing is safe (especially when they are profiting from said technology), does not amount to anything. Especially when so many actual people are being made sick from this technology.

I do have one basic question for you. Above you state that smart meters have been extensively studied (I presume you mean for health effects). Can you point to one study specifically on smart meters where an actual population was studied to see if there were negative health effects?

The Texas PUC report (and others like it) simply state that smart meter RF emissions (those 190,000 pulses per day) are within FCC guidelines, so they must be safe. Yet, FCC guidelines only protect us from acute heating. They do not take into account thousands of studies that show biological effects from long-term, cumulative, non-thermal exposures. These studies show DNA damage, blood-brain-barrier damage, infertility and neurological, endocrine and immune system disruption.

When you really take the time to look into this issue, you will see why so many people are being injured by this technology.





Interesting article. Clearly the utilities need to educate everyone about smart meters. Specifically, they are harmless and not as smart as you might think.

For example, perhaps the utilities could be more clear about the kind of information they are collecting. It's not possible for a box outside of your house to monitor what's happening inside of the house. The smart meter is only monitoring the electricity going in and out of the house. This is already happening with old school meters. The difference is that the information is collected once a month and by a person.

Regarding health risks, if you live in a place where cell phones are used or you can pick up a wireless internet signal you are already being exposed to low levels of electromagnetic waves. You have no choice in this matter and there is no proof that these low levels of energy do any harm to us.
The real issue is control. If I am not allowed the option to opt out, then I have no control.

With a smart phone, I can control the amount of sharing that I do. I can choose not to carry a smartphone. I can exercise the various options to control who actually sees my data, or knows my location, or any of those things you mention. When news comes out that questions how some of these companies handle the data they get from the phone or services that they sell us: all heck breaks loose.

Here in Georgia, we have no choice with a smart meter. You are not allowed to opt out of sharing your data with the utility company. Short of disconnecting from the grid, you have no control. Until smart meters come with a big red switch you can go outside and toss over to NO, this issue will be with us. Then, and only then, will any of the various dangling carrots that you mention - work.

Ah yes, you might think you have control about how much information you're sharing, but everything you do on the internet is recorded whether you give permission or not. The only thing you have a choice on, is whether an entity displays this info to your network of friends, on your profile page, etc... This is true of smart phones as well.

The only way to avoid them collecting your information, is to not use their service. This is exactly the same issue as the smart meters. If you don't want them to collect the amount of electricity you use and transmit this info electronically, you can opt out of their service.

Get some solar panels and go off the grid. Or don't use electricity at all.

If you want to be tied to the grid, you're going to have to use smart meters.
Thanks for your comment! You're right, control is an important issue, and I'm sorry to hear that your utility does not provide the choice to opt-out of a smart meter in favor of a more traditional meter. Many utilities do provide this option, although there is often a fee associated with the traditional meter because it understandably costs the utility more to send a service person out to read the meter rather than reading the balance remotely with a smart meter.

Also, speaking of cost, utilities really don't have the resources or the incentive to actually monitor the data collected by smart meters - it is just used like data from traditional meters for billing purposes. Nobody at the utility has the time or desire to track how much energy any particular customer is using, but if the customer wants to monitor their own data to better understand how to save energy and money, that is a huge benefit of smart meters.

Post new comment

You must be to leave a comment.